Showing posts with label Earth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Earth. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Moon




It is a fact that our Moon is drifting further away from Earth every day at a rate measured as 3.8 cm per year. Leading to tidal braking that lengthens everyday by 0.002 seconds every century as measured by what Neil and Buzz left on the moon.

The Moon has had dramatic effects on our planet and the life that inhabits it. The Moon stabilizes Earth's rotation preventing dramatic movements of the poles that contribute to climate swings that some scientists claim might have doomed any chance for life to form, let alone evolve, if not for the Moon. And biologists speculate that tides (generated primarily by the Moon and Sun) would have been a logical place for life to originate. Sea creatures might have then used tidal regions as experimental sites for testing the habitability of land providing an opportunity to develop lungs. It has been postulated that ancient gilled creatures might have used the Moon like a gravitational guiding light similar to modern migratory birds to the first non-aquatic procreation sites. In that sense, the only coincidence in all this is the fact that the Moon ever came to exist in the first place. For there was a brief time in the early history of our planet (Approximately 100 million years or less) when there was no Moon in the sky above Earth.





During the past 4.5 billion years, the Earth's gravity has slowed the Moon's rotation down resulting in the satellite's drifting away. The cause is complex, involving tides. (discussed below) The amazing result is now a readily observable set of very interesting facts: It takes the Moon 
29.5 days to make one revolution about its axis. All the while, of course, the Moon is also going around the Earth. This orbit also takes  29.5 days.  Both are computed as sidereal periods of the moon, with respect to the stars.  

Because the Moon's orbit and rotation times are the same, the satellite currently shows the same face to us on Earth. The area of the moon that is illuminated is visible to us when sunlight reflects off the Earth facing side. On the Moon, all this means that the Sun rises every four weeks, roughly 29.5 days. It also means there is no "dark side" of the Moon, at least not to someone living in any hypothetical Lunaville. The side of the Moon we cannot see from Earth gets its full share of sunshine periodically, when the Moon is between Earth and the Sun. In this configuration, the Moon is said to be new, and it reflects no sunlight our way.  Just as a lunar eclipse these are the often the darkest of nights on Earth.

There was a time when the timing of our system was much different.



While physics defines gravity as the weakest of all the fundamental forces. But one aspect of gravity is very consequential: Gravity never goes away. It weakens with distance, but it is always at work. This fact is the primary driver of tides. The side of Earth nearest the Moon always gets tugged by a force greater than the other side, a difference of about 6 percent. It could truthfully be said that there are two high tides on this planet at any given moment. Another far more complex set of phenomena explains this. The Moon does not just go around the Earth. In reality, the two objects orbit about a common gravitational midpoint, called a barycenter. The mass of each object and the distance between them dictates that this barycenter is inside Earth, about three-fourths of the way out from the center, churning and pulling on the Earths Molten core. Other planets also pull on each other, as does the sun with some intriguing possibilities (more video).

So close your eyes and picture this with the largest portion of your mind, the visual cortex. The center of the Earth actually orbits around this barycenter, once a month. The effect of this is very important. Think, for a second, of a spacecraft orbiting Earth. Its astronauts experience zero gravity. That's not because there is no gravity up there. It's because the ship and its occupants are constantly falling toward Earth while also moving sideways around the planet. This sets up a perpetual free-fall, or zero-g. Like the orbiting spaceship, the center of the Earth is in free-fall around the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system. And on he side of Earth opposite the Moon, the force of the Moon's gravity is less than at the center of the Earth, because of the greater distance. It can actually be thought of as a negative force, in essence, pulling water away from the Moon and away from Earth's surface -- a second high tide. Our planet rotates under these constantly shifting forces, which is why high and low tides are always moving about, rolling in and rolling out as far from the perspective of observers on the shore.

The Sun, too, has a tidal effect on Earth, but because of its greater distance it is responsible for only about one-third of the range in tides. When the Earth, Moon and Sun are aligned (at full or new Moon), tides can be unusually dramatic, on both the high and low ends. When the Moon is at a 90-degree angle to the Sun in our sky (at first quarter or last quarter) tides tend to be less extreme.





 

Tides are at the root of alterations in the entire Earth-Moon orbital system. Tides affect the Earth as it spins once per day, while the Moon goes around the planet at a much slower monthly pace. The planet is always dragging the tides along. The high-tide bulges are pulled just ahead of an imaginary line connecting the centers of Earth and the Moon. It might seem rather amazing, but a terrestrial bulge of water has enough mass to tug at the Moon from yet another angle. The effect is to constantly prod the Moon into a higher orbit, which explains (in part) why it is drifting away from our Earth. Meanwhile the moon is yanking back on the tidal bulges. Therefore water, down where it meets the ocean floor, rubs against Earth. This slows the planet down, explaining why there are 24 hours in a day instead of the mere 18 hours per rotation experienced a billion years ago.



The final factor that helped all these opposing dynamics reach an agreement of sorts involves the  deformation of solid rock. More than just water is pulled up by tides. Earth's solid self actually stretches under these astrological forces as well.  The Earth's gravity lifts tides on the Moon, raising relatively small bulges of solid material in the seemingly solid satellite. (Similarly, Jupiter's gravity raises tides on its icy moons in the frigid outer region of the solar system, stretching some so dramatically that the action generates enough heat to maintain liquid oceans under their frozen shells, scientists believe.) Continual tugging on the lunar bulges reduced the Moon's rotation rate over time. When the rotation had slowed to the point that it equaled the time it took for the Moon to go around the Earth, the lunar bulges lined up with our planet, and the slowdown stopped. At that moment, one face of the Moon became forever locked in our direction.  But it is not the only natural satellite.

Earth's rotation rate is still decelerating as our days are getting longer and longer. Eventually, our planet's tidal bulges will be assembled along the, a fore mentioned, imaginary line running through the centers of both Earth and the Moon, and our planetary rotational change will pretty much cease. Earth's day will be a month long. When this equilibrium is attained, billions of years from now, the terrestrial month will be longer (approximately 40 of our current days) because during all this time the Moon will continue moving away.

In this future Earth-Moon any lunar colonists would then, henceforth, see just one face of Earth. We can imagine this setup by stretching  out our arms, and looking at our palms. Now twirl around like a whirling dervish. Our face and palm are relatively parallel the whole time. If the United States happens to be on the back of your head, well, just think what people there do not see, and will never see again from there.


One day our descendants, if they survive our swelling Sun, cosmic, and human perils, will have at least 960 hours to work with each day. On some nights, half the world will be able to stare up at a full Moon for what (today) seems like days and days. Imagine the loony things they will have time to imagine, the strange lore they might conjure, the problems they will discover and solve, the peace they will enjoy.

 







Saturday, July 20, 2013

Deep Water Aquaculture




Scott Gerhardt
Engr 350
Challenge definition/ technical merit
12/7/9
Challenge Definition/ Technical Merit

Deep water aqua-culture has the ability to provide a sustainable high quality food source to both existing populations and the burgeoning growth of the coming centuries. While affixing massive amounts of carbon dioxide that is contributing to threats to our way of life such as oceanic acidification and global climate change.  Modeled on naturally occurring systems infrastructure could be constructed and implemented to optimize the ocean.  Reducing uncertainty and avoiding catastrophe, such as the current anthropogenic system of overfishing which threatens both human and fish populations; as well as regulating hypoxic (kidwell, S2)  dead zones, such as those located off the coast of Oregon, where the turnover in ocean water is naturally excessive to the point that the algae removes the oxygen leaving no possibility for the natural system to continue.  This proposed design is based loosely on the combines that rule agrarian communities.  Originally designed to combine different steps in the harvest process, reduce labor, and improve production and efficiency they were modeled on cheap fuel; but now these behemoths are not currently congruent with sustainability.  This deep water aquaculture platform would combine modern fisheries with natural ecological systems to provide consistent fuel(food) at the source.  By using infrastructure to reduce the uncertainty of the system in a number of ways:  Regulating the flow of the deep nutrient rich water from the aphotic zone (Beckman, 8) to the surface to sustain algae blooms through piping powered by wave action; netting to both contain and protect fish; and aerators to maintain appropriate oxygen content to ensuring algae, phytoplankton, protozoa, krill, shrimp survival, as well as any higher order consumers as market demands adjust.  The materials used to construct the systems could have a copper plating to minimize marine fouling and/or an iron plating to 'seed' the nutrient rich water as the iron corrodes and enters the solution (ocean).  thereby allowing for a time release control.  
http://web.stagram.com/p/603741662152749412_3808579  via NASA Goddard
This project is volumetrically superior to any form of agriculture currently proposed or in practice, and has the advantage of running in and depending on cycles of sustainability.  The pump to bring up the nutrient rich water will be wave driven.  The aerators can be run mechanically off solar focuser technology improving efficiency.  Vertical axis wind turbines (Howell, 418) can also be use to stabilize and energize the platform.  The waste from the aquaculture will fall back into the deep to be naturally recycled into more nutrient rich water to continue the cycle.(Fabi, 58)  Oceanic currents could also be harnessed to power auxiliary systems. The economics of the system are low as far as operational and maintenance costs, if it is designed to avoid collisions with ships and damage from hurricanes. The initial construction has estimation difficulties are due to the lack of material science and associated costs with those materials, not to mention scaling for optimization of operation.  This system would work in the entire deep ocean but would benefit from avoiding, or logistically partnering with, existing shipping lanes to maximize life cycle value.  It would also require wave action and sunshine which most of the ocean has. 
Traditional aquaculture has issues with product quality directly related to the unnatural source.(Hacero-Cruzado)  It also has issues with disease due to the lack of water flow which has been battled with antibiotics (Löfgren, 1808) and imported species which have become invasive.  It also destroys or occupies valuable coastal ecologies.  Deep water aquaculture has none of these issues.  It would however require research into the material science necessary to support the webbing/netting containing the fish, the concrete used to reduce calcium loss and maintain integrity, and the material to be used for the pipe/tube that would have to maintain operation at great depth and in dynamic oceanic currents.  The returns can be quantified economically although it is currently indeterminate as to the initial investment cost as far as construction is concerned.  It would require research into ecological engineering to maximize the output and define the order of magnitude for implementation.  Choosing the appropriate organisms to foster could be the difference in terms of viability short and long term.  But by choosing the suitable organisms some of the pollution in the ocean may be removed rather than being passed on to the next higher consumer, humans.  There would also be issues concerning the survivability of deep water infrastructure given the areas where they would be most viable happen to coincide with tropical depressions, hurricanes, which provide the same obstacles to other boats and oil platforms.  The most important lessons are yet to be learned and require flexibility in and of understanding as implemented in all the fields requiring continued research. This methodology was not conceived forward from technology or complex strategies.  Instead this idea grew backward from the needs of humanity and the planet Earth in order to design the most efficient and simplest system possible. 


Works cited: